Chapter 14
If the conditional probability of obtaining our test statistic, or more extreme, is very small: \[ p < \alpha \] We have evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
This probability is the p-value and the discernment level (\(\alpha\)) (or significance level) is our threshold for “very small”.
On the other hand, if the p-value is greater (or equal to) \(\alpha\), we say the results are not statistically significant and we fail to reject.
Note: we don’t say \(H_0\) is true – just that we don’t have evidence to say it’s not!
This should always be done before seeing the data!
What are the consequences of making an incorrect decision?
we might correcly fail to reject (good decision)
we might incorrectly reject the null hypothesis
we might correcly reject (good decision)
we might incorrectly fail to reject the null hypothesis
Suppose the null hypothesis is \(H_0\)
How likely these errors are depends on discernment level.
What are the consequences for making each type of error?
Choose \(\alpha\) accordingly!
A researcher believes that the mean number of pesticides is higher in the Willamette river than compared to a 1996 report that cited 36 different pesticides. The researcher collects samples from the river over a year’s time and found a significant increase in the mean number of pesticides.
To avoid Type I errors, make it harder to reject \(H_0\) – make discernment level smaller
To avoid Type II errors, make it easier to reject \(H_0\) – make discernment level bigger